Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT).
Authors: Hoffmann, Hans Jürgen
Knol, Edward F
Ferrer, Martha
Mayorga, Lina
Sabato, Vito
Santos, Alexandra F
Eberlein, Bernadette
Nopp, Anna
MacGlashan, Donald
Keywords: Allergy;BAT;Basophil granulocyte;CD63;Chronic urticaria;Mast cell
metadata.dc.subject.mesh: Basophils
Flow Cytometry
Issue Date: 2016
Abstract: We review basophil testing by flow cytometry with an emphasis on advantages and disadvantages. There are many tools available to assess the presence and severity of allergic diseases in patients. For 50 years, peripheral blood basophils have been used as tools to study these diseases. It is a very accessible cell that binds IgE antibody and secretes the classical mediators responsible for the symptoms of allergic reactions. In the last decade, an even more accessible methodology, using flow cytometry, has been developed to enhance the ability to use basophils for both mechanistic and clinical diagnostics. Basophil testing has been included in diagnostics for different forms of allergies as well as to monitor disease status. A variety of studies have begun to establish both precise methods and their clinical relevance for disease diagnosis, but there remain some important questions on how to take optimal advantage of the behaviours of basophils.
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1007/s11882-016-0633-6
Appears in Collections:Producción 2020

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

This item is protected by original copyright

Except where otherwise noted, Items on the Andalusian Health Repository site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License.