Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10668/10667
Title: | Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens plus an NS5A inhibitor for patients with HCV genotype 3 infection and cirrhosis. Results of a multicenter real-life cohort. |
Authors: | Alonso, S Riveiro-Barciela, M Fernandez, I Rincón, D Real, Y Llerena, S Gea, F Olveira, A Fernandez-Carrillo, C Polo, B Carrión, J A Gómez, A Devesa, M J Baliellas, C Castro, Á Ampuero, J Granados, R Pascasio, J M Rubín, A Salmeron, J Badia, E Planas, J M M Lens, S Turnes, J Montero, J L Buti, M Esteban, R Fernández-Rodríguez, C M |
Keywords: | SVR12;cirrhosis;daclatasvir;genotype 3;hepatitis C;ledipasvir;observational study;real-world cohort;sofosbuvir |
metadata.dc.subject.mesh: | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antiviral Agents Female Genotype Hepacivirus Hepatitis C, Chronic Humans Liver Cirrhosis Male Middle Aged Ribavirin Sofosbuvir Treatment Outcome Viral Nonstructural Proteins Young Adult |
Issue Date: | 9-Dec-2016 |
Abstract: | Patients with HCV genotype 3 (GT3) infection and cirrhosis are currently the most difficult to cure. We report our experience with sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (SOF+DCV) or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), with or without ribavirin (RBV) in clinical practice in this population. This was a multicenter observational study including cirrhotic patients infected by HCV GT3, treated with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (May 2014-October 2015). In total, 208 patients were included: 98 (47%) treatment-experienced, 42 (20%) decompensated and 55 (27%) MELD score >10. In 131 (63%), treatment was SOF+DCV and in 77 (37%), SOF/LDV. Overall, 86% received RBV. RBV addition and extension to 24 weeks was higher in the SOF/LDV group (95% vs 80%, P=.002 and 83% vs 72%, P=.044, respectively). A higher percentage of decompensated patients were treated with DCV than LDV (25% vs 12%, P=.013). Overall, SVR12 was 93.8% (195/208): 94% with SOF+DCV and 93.5% with SOF/LDV. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of decompensated patients. Eleven treatment failures: 10 relapses and one breakthrough. RBV addition did not improve SVR (RR: 1.08; P=.919). The single factor associated with failure to achieve SVR was platelet count 10. In 131 (63%), treatment was SOF+DCV and in 77 (37%), SOF/LDV. Overall, 86% received RBV. RBV addition and extension to 24 weeks was higher in the SOF/LDV group (95% vs 80%, P=.002 and 83% vs 72%, P=.044, respectively). A higher percentage of decompensated patients were treated with DCV than LDV (25% vs 12%, P=.013). Overall, SVR12 was 93.8% (195/208): 94% with SOF+DCV and 93.5% with SOF/LDV. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of decompensated patients. Eleven treatment failures: 10 relapses and one breakthrough. RBV addition did not improve SVR (RR: 1.08; P=.919). The single factor associated with failure to achieve SVR was platelet count |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10668/10667 |
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | 10.1111/jvh.12648 |
Appears in Collections: | Producción 2020 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is protected by original copyright |
Except where otherwise noted, Items on the Andalusian Health Repository site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License.