Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11325
Title: First-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI in colorectal cancer with multiple or unresectable liver metastases: A randomised, phase II trial (PLANET-TTD).
Authors: Carrato, Alfredo
Abad, Albert
Massuti, Bartomeu
Grávalos, Cristina
Escudero, Pilar
Longo-Muñoz, Federico
Manzano, José-Luis
Gómez, Auxiliadora
Safont, María José
Gallego, Javier
García-Paredes, Beatriz
Pericay, Carles
Dueñas, Rosario
Rivera, Fernando
Losa, Ferrán
Valladares-Ayerbes, Manuel
González, Encarnación
Aranda, Enrique
Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD)
Keywords: FOLFIRI;FOLFOX;First-line;Liver-limited disease;Metastatic colorectal cancer;Panitumumab;Resection
metadata.dc.subject.mesh: Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Camptothecin
Colorectal Neoplasms
Female
Fluorouracil
Humans
Leucovorin
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Organoplatinum Compounds
Panitumumab
Spain
Survival Analysis
Issue Date: 19-Jun-2017
Abstract: In first-line wild-type (WT)-Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), panitumumab (Pmab) improves outcomes when added to FOLFOX [folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin] or FOLFIRI [folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan]. However no trial has directly compared these combinations. Multicentre, open-label study in untreated patients ≥ 18 years with (WT)-KRAS mCRC and multiple or unresectable liver-limited disease (LLD) randomised to either Pmab-FOLFOX4 or Pmab-FOLFIRI. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points included liver metastases resection rate (R0 + R1), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events and perioperative safety. Exploratory end-points were: response by RAS status, early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in WT-RAS patients. Data on 77 patients were analysed (38 Pmab-FOLFOX4; 39 Pmab-FOLFIRI; WT-RAS: 27/26, respectively). ORR was 74% with Pmab-FOLFOX4 and 67% with Pmab-FOLFIRI (WT-RAS: 78%/73%). Out of the above, 45% and 59% underwent surgical resection, respectively (WT-RAS: 37%/69%). The R0-R1 resection rate was 34%/46% (WT-RAS:26%/54%). Median PFS was 13/14 months (hazard ratio [HR] Pmab-FOLFIRI versus Pmab-FOLFOX4: 0.9; 95% confidence interval: [0.6-1.5]; WT-RAS:13/15; HR: 0.7 [0.4-1.3]). Median OS was 37/41 months (HR:1.0 [0.6-1.8]; WT-RAS: 39/49; HR:0.9 [0.4-1.9]). In WT-RAS patients with confirmed response, median DpR was 71%/66%, and 65%/77% of patients showed ETS ≥ 30%/ ≥ 20% at week 8, without significant differences between arms; these patients had longer median PFS and OS and higher resectability rates. Surgery was associated with longer survival. Perioperative and overall safety were similar, except for higher grade 3/4 neutropenia (40%/10%; p = 0.003) and neuropathy (13%/0%; p = 0.025) in the Pmab-FOLFOX4 arm. In patients with WT-KRAS mCRC and LLD, both first-line Pmab-FOLFOX4 and Pmab-FOLFIRI resulted in high ORR and ETS, allowing potentially curative resection. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the two regimens. (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00885885).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11325
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.024
Appears in Collections:Producción 2020

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons