Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11767
Title: [Impact of disabling chronic pain: results of a cross-sectional population study with face-to-face interview].
Other Titles: Impacto del dolor crónico discapacitante: resultados de un estudio poblacional transversal con entrevista cara a cara.
Authors: Cabrera-Leon, Andrés
Cantero-Braojos, Miguel Ángel
Keywords: Calidad de vida;Chronic pain;Cross-sectional studies;Disability;Discapacidad;Dolor crónico;Estudio transversal;Health services;Medicamentos;Medicines;Quality of life;Servicios sanitarios
metadata.dc.subject.mesh: Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Chronic Pain
Confidence Intervals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Health Status
Health Surveys
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Occupational Diseases
Probability
Quality of Life
Sex Factors
Spain
Issue Date: 16-Nov-2017
Abstract: To assess the impact of disabling chronic pain (DCP) on quality of life, work, consumption of medication and usage of health services. Cross-sectional population study with face-to-face interview. Andalusian Health Survey (2011 edition). 6,507 people over the age of 16 (p=q=0.5; confidence level=95%; sampling error=1.49, design effect=1.52). Not applicable. Dependent variable: DCP: population limited in their activity by any of the CP specified in the survey. quality of life, absence from work, consumption of medication and utilization of health services. Compared to a population without CP, DCP impact is 6 points less on the mental quality of life and 12 points on the physical one, medication consumption is triple, health services utilization is almost double, and long absence from work is triple. On the other hand, a population with nondisabling chronic pain (nDCP) presents similar results to a population without CP. We have considered DCP as another CP category because of its huge impact, as is shown in our study, on the study variables. On the contrary, the population with nDCP does not obtain significant impact differences when compared to the population without CP. Therefore, we believe that Primary Care and Public Health should lead different prevention strategies for DCP as well as for the identification of the nDCP population to decrease its possible deterioration towards DCP.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/11767
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.03.020
Appears in Collections:Producción 2020

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PMC6839206.pdf1,02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons