Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/2392
Título : Specific allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of atopic eczema.
Autor : Tam, Herman
Calderon, Moises A
Manikam, Logan
Nankervis, Helen
García Núñez, Ignacio
Williams, Hywel C
Durham, Stephen
Boyle, Robert J
Filiación: [Tam,H; Manikam,L; Boyle,RJ] Section of Paediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. [Calderón,MA; Durham,S] Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. [Narkervis,H] c/o Cochrane Skin Group, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. [García Núñez,I] Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain. [Williams,HC] Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Palabras clave : Alérgenos
Adulto
Animales
Niño
Dermatitis atópica
Dermatophagoides farinae
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
Desensibilización inmunológica
Humanos
Ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados como asunto
MeSH: Medical Subject Headings::Chemicals and Drugs::Biological Factors::Antigens::Allergens
Medical Subject Headings::Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals
Medical Subject Headings::Named Groups::Persons::Age Groups::Child
Medical Subject Headings::Diseases::Immune System Diseases::Hypersensitivity::Hypersensitivity, Immediate::Dermatitis, Atopic
Medical Subject Headings::Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Invertebrates::Arthropods::Arachnida::Acari::Mites::Pyroglyphidae::Dermatophagoides farinae
Medical Subject Headings::Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Invertebrates::Arthropods::Arachnida::Acari::Mites::Pyroglyphidae::Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
Medical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Therapeutics::Biological Therapy::Immunomodulation::Immunotherapy::Immunosuppression::Desensitization, Immunologic
Medical Subject Headings::Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Chordata::Vertebrates::Mammals::Primates::Haplorhini::Catarrhini::Hominidae::Humans
Medical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Evaluation Studies as Topic::Clinical Trials as Topic::Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic::Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Medical Subject Headings::Named Groups::Persons::Age Groups::Adult
Fecha de publicación : Feb-2016
Editorial : Cochrane Skin Group
Cita Bibliográfica: Tam H, Calderon MA, Manikam L, Nankervis H, García Núñez I, Williams HC, et al. Specific allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of atopic eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2:CD008774
Abstract: BACKGROUND Specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT) is a treatment that may improve disease severity in people with atopic eczema (AE) by inducing immune tolerance to the relevant allergen. A high quality systematic review has not previously assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT), including subcutaneous, sublingual, intradermal, and oral routes, compared with placebo or a standard treatment in people with atopic eczema. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to July 2015: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2015), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1982), Web of Science™ (from 2005), the Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT database), and five trials databases. We searched abstracts from recent European and North American allergy meetings and checked the references of included studies and review articles for further references to relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of specific allergen immunotherapy that used standardised allergen extracts in people with AE. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently undertook study selection, data extraction (including adverse effects), assessment of risk of bias, and analyses. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We identified 12 RCTs for inclusion in this review; the total number of participants was 733. The interventions included SIT in children and adults allergic to either house dust mite (10 trials), grass pollen, or other inhalant allergens (two trials). They were administered subcutaneously (six trials), sublingually (four trials), orally, or intradermally (two trials). Overall, the risk of bias was moderate, with high loss to follow up and lack of blinding as the main methodological concern.Our primary outcomes were 'Participant- or parent-reported global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment'; 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures'; and 'Adverse events, such as acute episodes of asthma or anaphylaxis'. SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) is a means of measuring the effect of atopic dermatitis by area (A); intensity (B); and subjective measures (C), such as itch and sleeplessness, which we used.For 'Participant- or parent-reported global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment', one trial (20 participants) found improvement in 7/9 participants (78%) treated with the SIT compared with 3/11 (27%) treated with the placebo (risk ratio (RR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 7.96; P = 0.04). Another study (24 participants) found no difference: global disease severity improved in 8/13 participants (62%) treated with the SIT compared with 9/11 (81%) treated with the placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.26; P = 0.38). We did not perform meta-analysis because of high heterogeneity between these two studies. The quality of the evidence was low.For 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures', two trials (184 participants) did not find that the SIT improved SCORAD part C (mean difference (MD) -0.74, 95% CI -1.98 to 0.50) or sleep disturbance (MD -0.49, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.06) more than placebo. For SCORAD part C itch severity, these two trials (184 participants) did not find that the SIT improved itch (MD -0.24, 95% CI -1.00 to 0.52). One other non-blinded study (60 participants) found that the SIT reduced itch compared with no treatment (MD -4.20, 95% CI -3.69 to -4.71) and reduced the participants' overall symptoms (P < 0.01), but we could not pool these three studies due to high heterogeneity. The quality of the evidence was very low.Seven trials reported systemic adverse reactions: 18/282 participants (6.4%) treated with the SIT had a systemic reaction compared with 15/210 (7.1%) with no treatment (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.49; the quality of the evidence was moderate). The same seven trials reported local adverse reactions: 90/280 participants (32.1%) treated with the SIT had a local reaction compared with 44/204 (21.6%) in the no treatment group (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.81). As these had the same study limitations, we deemed the quality of the evidence to also be moderate.Of our secondary outcomes, there was a significant improvement in 'Investigator- or physician-rated global assessment of disease severity at the end of treatment' (six trials, 262 participants; RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.88). None of the studies reported our secondary outcome 'Parent- or participant-rated eczema severity assessed using a published scale', but two studies (n = 184), which have been mentioned above, used SCORAD part C, which we included as our primary outcome 'Participant- or parent-reported specific symptoms of eczema, by subjective measures'.Our findings were generally inconclusive because of the small number of studies. We were unable to determine by subgroup analyses a particular type of allergen or a particular age or level of disease severity where allergen immunotherapy was more successful. We were also unable to determine whether sublingual immunotherapy was associated with more local adverse reactions compared with subcutaneous immunotherapy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, the quality of the evidence was low. The low quality was mainly due to the differing results between studies, lack of blinding in some studies, and relatively few studies reporting participant-centred outcome measures. We found limited evidence that SIT may be an effective treatment for people with AE. The treatments used in these trials were not associated with an increased risk of local or systemic reactions. Future studies should use high quality allergen formulations with a proven track record in other allergic conditions and should include participant-reported outcome measures.
Descripción : Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Review;
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/2392
Versión del editor : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008774.pub2/abstract
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008774.pub2
ISSN : 1469-493X (Online)
1361-6137 (Print)
Appears in Collections:01- Artículos - Hospital Regional de Málaga

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HamH_SpecificAllergenImmunotherapy.pdfArtículo publicado744,33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons