Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/777
Título : Determinants of non- response to a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the EPIC-PANACEA study.
Autor : May, Anne M
Adema, Lotte E
Romaguera, Dora
Vergnaud, Anne-Claire
Agudo, Antonio
Ekelund, Ulf
Steffen, Annika
Orfanos, Philippos
Slimani, Nadia
Rinaldi, Sabina
Mouw, Traci
Rohrmann, Sabine
Hermann, Silke
Boeing, Heiner
Bergmann, Manuela M
Jakobsen, Marianne Uhre
Overvad, Kim
Wareham, Nicholas J
Gonzalez, Carlos
Tjonneland, Anne
Halkjaer, Jytte
Key, Timothy J
Spencer, Elizabeth A
Hellstrom, Veronica
Manjer, Jonas
Hedblad, Bo
Lund, Eiliv
Braaten, Tonje
Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise
Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
Rodríguez, Laudina
Sánchez, Maria J
Dorronsoro, Miren
Barricarte, Aurelio
Huerta, Jose Maria
Naska, Androniki
Trichopoulou, Antonia
Palli, Domenico
Pala, Valeria
Norat, Teresa
Mattiello, Amalia
Tumino, Rosario
van der A, Daphne
Bueno-de-Mesquita, H Bas
Riboli, Elio
Peeters, Petra H M
Filiación: [May,AM; Adema,LE; Peeters,PHM] Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University,Utrecht, The Netherlands. [May,AM; van der Daphne,A; Bueno-de-Mesquita,HB] National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. [Romaguera,D; Vergnaud,AC; Mouw,T; Norat,T; Riboli,E; Peeters,PHM] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. [Agudo,A; Gonzalez,C] Unit of Nutrition, Environment and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain. [Ekelund,U; Wareham,NJ] Medical Research Council, Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Steffen,A; Boeing,H; Bergmann,MM] German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam Rehbrücke, Heidelberg, Germany. [Orfanos,P; Naska,A; Trichopoulou,A] Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece AND Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. [Slimani,N; Rinaldi,S] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), Lyon, France. [Rohrmann,S; Hermann,S] Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany. [Jakobsen,MU; Overvad,K] Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. [Overvad,K] Department of Cardiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. [Tjonneland,A; Halkjaer,J] Danish Cancer Society, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Key,TJ; Spencer,EA] Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Hellstrom,V] Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine,Nutritional Research, Umea University, Umea, Sweden. [Manjer,J] Department of Surgery, Malmø University Hospital, Lund University, Malmø, Sweden. [Hedblad,B] Department of Clinical Science, Malmø University Hospital, Lund University, Malmø, Sweden. [Lund,E; Braaten,T] Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. [Clavel-Chapelon,F; Boutron-Ruault,MC] Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale(INSERM), Villejuif, France. [Clavel-Chapelon,F; Boutron-Ruault,MC] Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. [Rodriguez,L] Public Health and Participation Directorate, Health and Health Care Services Council, Asturias, Spain. [Sanchez,MJ] Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, and CIBER de Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Granada, Spain. [Dorronsoro,M] Public Health Department of Gipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain. [Barricarte,A] Public Health Institute of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. [Huerta,JM] Epidemiology Department, Council of Health and Consumer Affairs, Murcia & CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Murcia, Spain. [Palli,D] Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, ISPO-Cancer Research and Prevention Institute, Florence, Italy.[Pala,V] Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Foundation, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy. [Mattiello,A] Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Napoli, Naples, Italy.[Tumino,R] Cancer Registry, Azienda Ospedaliera "Civile M.P.Arezzo", Ragusa, Italy.
Palabras clave : Non-response
Non-participation
Lost-to-follow-up
Follow-up
Health survey
Nonresponse bias
Selection bias
Population
cohort
Attrition
representativeness
Participation
Predictors
Encuestas epidemiológicas
Estilo de Vida
MeSH: Medical Subject Headings::Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Data Collection::Health Surveys
Medical Subject Headings::Psychiatry and Psychology::Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms::Psychology, Social::Life Style
Fecha de publicación : 24-Sep-2012
Editorial : BioMed Central
Cita Bibliográfica: May AM, Adema LE, Romaguera D, Vergnaud AC, Agudo A, Ekelund U, et al. Determinants of non- response to a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the EPIC-PANACEA study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12:148
Abstract: BACKGROUND This paper discusses whether baseline demographic, socio-economic, health variables, length of follow-up and method of contacting the participants predict non-response to the invitation for a second assessment of lifestyle factors and body weight in the European multi-center EPIC-PANACEA study. METHODS Over 500.000 participants from several centers in ten European countries recruited between 1992 and 2000 were contacted 2-11 years later to update data on lifestyle and body weight. Length of follow-up as well as the method of approaching differed between the collaborating study centers. Non-responders were compared with responders using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall response for the second assessment was high (81.6%). Compared to postal surveys, centers where the participants completed the questionnaire by phone attained a higher response. Response was also high in centers with a short follow-up period. Non-response was higher in participants who were male (odds ratio 1.09 (confidence interval 1.07; 1.11), aged under 40 years (1.96 (1.90; 2.02), living alone (1.40 (1.37; 1.43), less educated (1.35 (1.12; 1.19), of poorer health (1.33 (1.27; 1.39), reporting an unhealthy lifestyle and who had either a low (<18.5 kg/m2, 1.16 (1.09; 1.23)) or a high BMI (>25, 1.08 (1.06; 1.10); especially ≥30 kg/m2, 1.26 (1.23; 1.29)). CONCLUSIONS Cohort studies may enhance cohort maintenance by paying particular attention to the subgroups that are most unlikely to respond and by an active recruitment strategy using telephone interviews.
Descripción : PubMed - in process
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/777
Versión del editor : http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/12/148
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-148
ISSN : 1471-2288 (Online)
Appears in Collections:01- Artículos - EASP. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
May_DeterminatsOfNonResponse.pdfArtículo publicado236,55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Except where otherwise noted, Items on the Andalusian Health Repository site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License.