Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Replacing red meat and processed red meat for white meat, fish, legumes or eggs is associated with lower risk of incidence of metabolic syndrome.
Authors: Becerra-Tomás, Nerea
Babio, Nancy
Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel
Corella, Dolores
Estruch, Ramon
Ros, Emilio
Fitó, Montserrat
Serra-Majem, Lluís
Salaverria, Itziar
Lamuela-Raventós, Rosa M
Lapetra, José
Gómez-Gracia, Enrique
Fiol, Miguel
Toledo, Estefanía
Sorlí, José V
Pedret-Llaberia, Maria Roser
Salas-Salvadó, Jordi
Keywords: Metabolic syndrome;PREDIMED-study;Processed red meat;Red meat;Total meat
metadata.dc.subject.mesh: Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diet, Healthy
Follow-Up Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Metabolic Syndrome
Middle Aged
Nutrition Assessment
Proportional Hazards Models
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Red Meat
Risk Factors
Issue Date: 31-Mar-2016
Abstract: Few studies have assessed the association between consumption of red meat (RM) and processed red meats (PRM) and the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and results have been inconsistent. We investigated associations between total consumption of meat and its subtypes and incident MetS and estimated the effect of substituting RM or PRM for alternative protein-rich foods. We analyzed 1868 participants (55-80 years-old) recruited into the PREDIMED study who had no MetS at baseline and were followed for a median of 3.2 years. MetS was defined using updated harmonized criteria. Anthropometric variables, dietary habits, and blood biochemistry were determined at baseline and yearly thereafter. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of MetS were estimated for the two upper tertiles (versus the lowest one) of mean consumption of meat and its subtypes during the follow-up as exposure. Comparing the highest vs the lowest tertile of consumption, we observed an increased risk of MetS incidence, with HRs of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.45) and 1.46 (CI: 1.22-1.74) for total meat and pooled RM and PRM, respectively. Compared with participants in the lowest tertile, those in the highest tertile of poultry and rabbit consumption had a lower risk of MetS incidence. The risk of MetS was lower when one-serving/day of RM or PRM was replaced by legumes, poultry and rabbit, fish or eggs. RM and PRM consumption was associated with higher risk of MetS. Replacing RM or PRM with other protein-rich foods related to a lower risk of MetS and should, therefore, be encouraged. This trial was registered at as ISRCTN35739639.
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.03.017
Appears in Collections:Producción 2020

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

This item is protected by original copyright

Except where otherwise noted, Items on the Andalusian Health Repository site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License.